Here she is folks - HD47
candidate Pam Ellis.
'
The liberal blogs, have
been attacking James Knox,
the GOP candidate for HD47
for weeks, so I think it's
only fitting to look at his
opponent, the one that
the libs are hoping they
can smear into office.
'
Fat Chance.
'
I invite one and all to
do a little research on Pam Ellis.
'
Start with the letter she put in the Billings Gazette, pushing Obamacare;
'
Next, go to her website;
'
Her website tells us all we need to know about her.
'
We all know that Governor Schweitzer has this State headed for fiscal calamity with his spending that he was able to push through the legislature. He increased State spending 40%, and added 1,000 new State employees since he's been in office.
'
SHE PRAISES HIM.
'
She's been a lifelong liberal educator, who doesn't understand life in the real world. To liberals like her, the taxpayers have lots of money.
'
She talks about energy development, YET, she's been endorsed by the most radical conservation group in Montana - here's the link; http://www.mtvoters.org/
'
So do we need another liberal Obama worshiper in Helena? NO.
'
Do we need another tax & spend liberal in Helena? NO.
'
The MSSA put out it's grades and endorsements for politicians, concerning their views on gun control. James Knox got the endorsement. And an 'A' rating. Pam Ellis either didn't want to offend the liberals, or she is in favor of gun control, because she refused to respond.
'
So the liberal blogs have decided to attack James Knox.
'
The latest attack is about his campaign signs. They don't know what they look like. They don't know where they are. They simply took a facebook post from somewhere, where Knox mentions his signs being stolen, and are trying to make it an issue.
'
I'm not fooled.
'
And if you want to go look at this smear campaign, I'll put up some links;
'
'
'
Utter nonsense, isn't it?
'
I have a suggestion for the Dems - next time try putting up candidates who are actually in touch with the real world.
So, our criticism of James Knox - he believes in racist theories (his own racism is unproven, but he cites books that emphasize outlandish racial theories), he has been criticized by business associates and the better business bureau for the way he handles his personal affairs, and his own campaign behavior is bizarre bordering on paranoid. Your criticism of Pam Ellis - she's liberal. She supports a watered down health care reform, she doesn't toe the line on gun rights, and she believes in protecting the environment.
ReplyDeleteDo you see how these methods differ? What you pointed out about Pam Ellis makes her a bad candidate if you hold conservative views. Most of her district does, so she may well lose. Knox's various problems make him a bad candidate for ANYONE to vote for. Thus, Ellis' election problems say something about her district - it is conservative. Knox, on the other hand, shows the problem with his party - it has exceedingly poor judgment and sky-high tolerance for intolerance.
Actually, wanting to protect the environment would be accceptable, just don't lie to me about wanting energy development, then in the next breath be a conservationist.
ReplyDeleteI am unaware of any problems the Knox has that would make him a bad candidate, and since I know the man personally, I would be in a better position to know than the libs trying the smear campaign.
Thanks for stopping by though.
Eric, the Christian Identity movement is so bizarre and out of touch with reality that a person who cites it and suggests it to others already has some trouble. And he clearly does that.
ReplyDeleteHe also promotes rejecting federal funding to maintain Montana's 'freedoms'. Last I heard, we had a lot of roads and not a lot of folks, so rejecting Federal funding could spell all kinds of bad news.
And a last point about Mr. Knox, he doesn't know how to use apostrophes or basic punctuation. And this isn't from the liberal smear campaign - this is a cursory analysis of his own words, publicly available.
Also, anyone you support who favors repealing 'obamacare' is clearly following the will of the minority of Americans, as the majority are asking for more.
Hmmm - I haven't heard in real life (non-blog)
ReplyDeleteANYBODY who thinks Obamacare is an improvement over the current status-quo.
Why do you think that no Dems are openly supporting it in their campaigns?
I'm not to good with basic punctuation either - LOL - I didn't like English class very much, and it's been more than 30 years since that time -
You're right, people don't like it because it is a fairly poor compromise. People want more, by a margin of 2 to 1, and yet the Republican party wants to give the majority the opposite of what they want.
ReplyDeleteActually 'Repeal & Replace' seems to be the number one choice Polish Wolf -
ReplyDelete