Last month I read a commentary in the Wall Street Journal - where they were advocating the idea that Obama should not seek re-election for the good of the country - here's the link;
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970203611404577041950781477944-lMyQjAxMTAxMDIwMDEyNDAyWj.html?mod=wsj_share_email
Suprisingly, the op-ed piece was written by two Democrats - not surprisingly, they are both pro-Hillary Clinton Dems -
What brings this to mind was what one of my customers said yesterday, that he had voted for Obama because he's collecting a union pension, but that he wouldn't vote for him again, and that he wished the Dems would nominate somebody else, anybody else.
I explained to him that the Dems would not/could not do that, because it would be racist.
Ever since Obama came on the political scene, anytime anybody disagreed with him, or his (bad) policies, they scream that the opposition is based on racism.
So now they're stuck.
With the latest Rasmussen poll showing Obama losing to Mittt Romney 45%-39% the Dems are now victims of their own strategy.
They're stuck with a sure loser. And they have to force a smile, feign enthusiasm, and go along with it.
LOL
